LAW DISSERTATION - 2020/1
Module code: LAW3005
In light of the Covid-19 pandemic, and in a departure from previous academic years and previously published information, the University has had to change the delivery (and in some cases the content) of its programmes, together with certain University services and facilities for the academic year 2020/21.
These changes include the implementation of a hybrid teaching approach during 2020/21. Detailed information on all changes is available at: https://www.surrey.ac.uk/coronavirus/course-changes. This webpage sets out information relating to general University changes, and will also direct you to consider additional specific information relating to your chosen programme.
Prior to registering online, you must read this general information and all relevant additional programme specific information. By completing online registration, you acknowledge that you have read such content, and accept all such changes.
The module provides the students who opt for the dissertation option to engage with independent research and critical writing, under the supervision of a member of staff. The module differs markedly from class-based teaching and learning and allows students to choose a topic of particular interest to them. Their work shall take place over an arch of approximately 4 months, therefore requiring good organisation skills and time-management.
School of Law
TAGGART Christopher (Schl of Law)
Number of Credits: 30
ECTS Credits: 15
Framework: FHEQ Level 6
JACs code: M200
Module cap (Maximum number of students): N/A
Prerequisites / Co-requisites
The Module has no fixed content, as the substantive topic of the dissertation will vary from student to student, according to their initial proposal, as moderated by the members of staff acting as supervisors. The subject must relate to a law module and must be approved by the School of Law. The topic may deal with an aspect of the law of the UK, or other jurisdictions, could relate to EU or international law, or could consist in a comparative study of an aspect of law across relevant jurisdictions. The student should then produce a 15,000-word word-processed dissertation which draws on primary and secondary sources, academic commentary and which analyses and evaluates the material and is arranged as a logical, structured and original piece of work, displaying evidence of research skills and critical thinking.
|Assessment type||Unit of assessment||Weighting|
|Coursework||15,000 WORD COURSEWORK||100|
The assessment strategy is designed to provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes listed above.
The marking shall be carried out in compliance with the grade descriptors included in the Handbook and approved by the Faculty. They are designed to reward critical analysis, solidity of research, clarity of structure and writing, substantive correctness and originality, rigorous style and referencing.
Thus, the summative assessment for this module consists of:
A mark on the dissertation. The mark will be agreed between two markers of the School’s staff, not including the dissertation supervisor. The dissertation can be submitted to the scrutiny of an external examiner.
- Develop the student's responsibility and aptitude to independent work
- Accustom the student with scientific writing of medium-length works
- Increase the student's skill in legal analysis and critical thinking
- Expose the student to legal research, possibly in view of further PG choices
- Allow the student to express her potential in a subject of particular interest
- Nurture the student's ability to work in cooperation with the supervisor and agree to a negotiated a working plan
|1||Produce a medium-length essay using the canons of legal writing and referencing||PT|
|2||Express their ideas clearly and in a structured way||T|
|3||Identify and critically evaluate the main legal issues raised by the title and critically evaluate them and where appropriate consider their wider context||KT|
|4||Identify and critically engage with legal sources from UK, European and, where appropriate, other jurisdictions||KPT|
|5||Critically analyse the relevant law, recognising gaps and inconsistencies, and to apply it to the issues raised by the title||KC|
|6||Engage critically with legal materials drawn from a wide variety of primary and secondary sources and doctrinal commentary||KPT|
|7||Demonstrate developed research skills in assimilating, processing and utilising knowledge||PT|
|8||Demonstrate competence at incorporating and applying, as appropriate, ethical values, philosophical principles, political constraints and critical thinking||KT|
|9||Have the ability to sustain sophisticated arguments based on the scholarly, legal, ethical and policy-based sources and ideas drawn upon, and reach appropriate conclusions drawn from their analysis of the law and of the issues raised by the question. Depending upon the nature of the question, such conclusions may appear in the course of analysis or in a concluding section||KT|
C - Cognitive/analytical
K - Subject knowledge
T - Transferable skills
P - Professional/Practical skills
Overall student workload
Methods of Teaching / Learning
The learning and teaching strategy is designed to:
Encourage the student to take responsibility for her work and planning;
Encourage the student to consult with the supervisor and act upon an agreed plan of working;
Favour the student’s inclination to take a position and evaluate the materials for the research;
Increase the student’s knowledge and familiarity with a specific aspect of law.
The learning and teaching methods include:
- Guided research;
- Regular meetings with the supervisor (typically: the kick-off meeting, the meeting after the first chapter, a meeting to discuss the first full draft)
- Independent studying;
- Revision of the successive drafts on the basis of supervisor’s comments.
Indicated Lecture Hours (which may also include seminars, tutorials, workshops and other contact time) are approximate and may include in-class tests where one or more of these are an assessment on the module. In-class tests are scheduled/organised separately to taught content and will be published on to student personal timetables, where they apply to taken modules, as soon as they are finalised by central administration. This will usually be after the initial publication of the teaching timetable for the relevant semester.
Reading list for LAW DISSERTATION : http://aspire.surrey.ac.uk/modules/law3005
Programmes this module appears in
|Law (JD Pathway) LLB (Hons)(YEAR LONG)||Year-long||Optional||A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module|
|Law with Criminology LLB (Hons)(YEAR LONG)||Year-long||Optional||A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module|
|Law LLB (Hons)(YEAR LONG)||Year-long||Optional||A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module|
|Law with International Relations LLB (Hons)(YEAR LONG)||Year-long||Optional||A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module|
Please note that the information detailed within this record is accurate at the time of publishing and may be subject to change. This record contains information for the most up to date version of the programme / module for the 2020/1 academic year.