US FOREIGN POLICY IN TRANSITION - 2026/7
Module code: POL3065
Module Overview
Following one of the most controversial administrations in recent history, this module situates the Trump presidency in the context of other executives and considers to what extent this period was a major departure for norms and strategy in US foreign policy. It considers recent history, theory and key concepts to reflect on the impact both for US power projection, and on world politics more generally.
Module provider
Politics & International Relations
Module Leader
GILLESPIE Ciaran (Politics IR)
Number of Credits: 15
ECTS Credits: 7.5
Framework: FHEQ Level 6
Module cap (Maximum number of students): N/A
Overall student workload
Independent Learning Hours: 100
Lecture Hours: 5
Seminar Hours: 11
Guided Learning: 17
Captured Content: 17
Module Availability
Semester 1
Prerequisites / Co-requisites
None
Module content
The module begins by considering the immediate historic and political drivers that provide the context for Trump's candidacy for President and for the foreign policy worldview his administration represented. We then consider how foreign policy gets formulated in the United States, before studying a number of specific areas in which Trump's foreign policy had distinctive characteristics. We look at a range of global challenges that the US continues to face and consider the extent to which the subsequent administration has responded to these problem areas, considering the relative power of the US, leading strategic ideas and the considerations of American ‘Decline.’ We conclude by looking at the way US foreign policy is in a state of transition, following Trump's era.
Assessment pattern
| Assessment type | Unit of assessment | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Coursework | ANALYSIS (1,250 WORDS) | 30 |
| Coursework | ESSAY (2,500 WORDS) | 70 |
Alternative Assessment
N/A
Assessment Strategy
The assessment strategy is designed to provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate:
- Analytical and critical skills
- The ability to write in depth on a specific area of foreign policy and its conceptual framing.
- The ability to work independently to produce professional grade research in a specific window of time
Thus, the assessment for this module consists of:
- (AI Authorised) A word intelligence analysis of a specific US statesperson, using a variety of pieces of evidence, most importantly their own words in speeches or policy planning documents.
- (Non AI Authorised) A longer essay on a specified area or era of foreign policy, with an option for an original question designed by student (only with previous sign off on question from module leader).
For the 1st assignment, students have been authorised to make use of Surrey AI tools, to help build their analysis of a given statesperson, and accumulate evidence on their perspectives of policy areas. Sessions will occur in class where open source intelligence strategies will be demonstrated and practiced as a key point of evidence development for the exercise.
The 2nd assignment, students are not authorised to use AI tools, and must instead build an original answer to one of the several essay question options. Their grade will be the product of a portfolio of work, including attempts at building practice structures and/or annotated bibliography that is subject to formative feedback through all stages of the module. Students will be expected, as per the marking rubric for the piece, to demonstrate how ideas for the piece were developed over time, providing evidence of their own, original work in knowledge development as part of assessment framework. Other materials, such as links to versions of assessment with version history, will also be accepted.
Formative assessment and feedback
The person analysis exercise is designed to equip students with knowledge of the policy literature and theory required to write analytically and critically on those who have shaped, or are shaping key areas of US foreign policy. Students will also receive advice and feedback on essay preparation (abstracts and plans) if they opt to. The essay is designed to build on this knowledge with further theoretical or empirical development of the subject matter from critique, or in a new area.
Students will need to demonstrate a range of key skills in the assessment; digital skills in research; resilience and resourcefulness in the production of this research; employability skills in their communication and presentation of this research; knowledge of global systems.
Module aims
- Build on, develop, refine and apply knowledge acquired in modules such POL1013 Introduction to International Relations, at Level 4; as well as POL2036 International Security, POL2034 International Organisations and POL2030 Theorising International Relations at Level 5.
- Provide students with a detailed understanding of how American foreign policy operates and the approaches it has historically taken across a range of key issue-areas.
- Enable students to analyse, understand and critique contemporary American foreign policy.
- Develop professional policy analysis skills through critical reading of policy pronouncements
Learning outcomes
| Attributes Developed | ||
| 001 | Demonstrate a clear understanding of the central ideological, theoretical; bureaucratic and historical drivers involved in the making and conduct of contemporary US foreign policy; | KCPT |
| 002 | Critically engage with contemporary themes in US foreign policy and be able to distinguish them from historical antecedents; | KCT |
| 003 | Apply theoretical frameworks to policy/empirical analysis. | KC |
| 004 | Development of key academic and professional skills in both seminar discussions (global and cultural intelligence) and through assessments that test digital skills, resourcefulness, and resilience. | CPT |
| 005 | Development of sector knowledge for enhanced employability | KPT |
| 006 | Reflection on key challenges in international public policy, such as international climate change agreements (sustainability) and difficult policy areas such as the War on Terror that require sensitivity (resilience) and empathy (global cultural intelligence) in discussion. | KCPT |
Attributes Developed
C - Cognitive/analytical
K - Subject knowledge
T - Transferable skills
P - Professional/Practical skills
Methods of Teaching / Learning
The learning and teaching strategy is designed to:
Encourage student independence in learning and teaching.
Encourage the sharing of literature, theory and knowledge in a collaborative environment.
Encourage analytical and critical thought.
The learning and teaching methods include:
Lectures will introduce students to the subject matter, which will subsequently be discussed in weekly seminars. Students will be expected to contribute actively during discussion, having prepared to answer a specific question based on between one and three key readings for the week. Three different questions and readings will be set to create a division of labour for the students and maximise learning. This requires all students to prepare each week for the topic. The set up of seminars and group work will be discussed during the first class.
Indicated Lecture Hours (which may also include seminars, tutorials, workshops and other contact time) are approximate and may include in-class tests where one or more of these are an assessment on the module. In-class tests are scheduled/organised separately to taught content and will be published on to student personal timetables, where they apply to taken modules, as soon as they are finalised by central administration. This will usually be after the initial publication of the teaching timetable for the relevant semester.
Reading list
https://readinglists.surrey.ac.uk
Upon accessing the reading list, please search for the module using the module code: POL3065
Programmes this module appears in
| Programme | Semester | Classification | Qualifying conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Law with International Relations LLB (Hons) | 1 | Optional | A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module |
| Politics BSc (Hons) | 1 | Optional | A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module |
| International Relations BSc (Hons) | 1 | Optional | A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module |
| Politics and International Relations BSc (Hons) | 1 | Optional | A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module |
| Politics and Economics BSc (Hons) | 1 | Optional | A weighted aggregate mark of 40% is required to pass the module |
Please note that the information detailed within this record is accurate at the time of publishing and may be subject to change. This record contains information for the most up to date version of the programme / module for the 2026/7 academic year.